Some construction companies buy and maintain large fleets of equipment. Others choose to lease these assets and, in some cases, purchase select pieces at the end of the arrangement. Still others opt to rent what they need, for only as long as they need it. When it comes to buying vs renting vs leasing construction equipment, making the right call among all of these approaches can seem overwhelming.
Every contractor would love to have a diverse fleet of equipment ready to deploy at a moment’s notice. But few, if any, want to deal with the potential financial repercussions.
It usually makes sense to buy equipment that you expect to use daily or almost daily. If you’re using an asset at or near its full capacity — even when your workload fluctuates — generally buying and maintaining it will pay off.
For starters, you’ll have the piece ready to go at a moment’s notice and, assuming proper maintenance, be able to extract maximum life-cycle value from it. Ownership also allows you to, where permissible, claim tax deductions for related depreciation, insurance, interest and repair expenses.
On the other hand, coming up with large down payments can be a financial strain. In addition, investing heavily in equipment ties up capital that you might better use in other ways. Consider, too:
As alluded to above, life cycle is everything. Many of today’s construction assets are evolving just as rapidly as the technology used to track and run it. So look carefully into whether you’ll be able to fully use a piece of equipment before it’s outmoded.
Leasing equipment offers some of the benefits of ownership while mitigating certain downsides. An equipment lease is essentially a loan arrangement in which the lender owns the equipment and leases it to a contractor at a flat monthly rate for a specified term.
At the end of that term, the lessee can opt to buy the equipment, return it or lease new assets. Just as some drivers prefer to lease vehicles to stay up to date and reduce their maintenance costs, many contractors see the same advantages in leasing equipment.
With leased assets, you can avoid making large down payments and reserve capital for other purposes. You’ll typically pay a higher interest rate, though, than you would for a bank loan to buy equipment outright.
Leases are usually set up so that payments are made with operating funds rather than capital accounts and, therefore, are deductible as an operating expense. But if a lease includes certain options (such as a bargain lease option) it may be defined as a capital lease and, therefore, need to be put on the books. Pending changes in accounting rules, however, will likely affect the way leases are handled on those books. (See the sidebar “New accounting rules will affect leases.”)
Renting offers the most flexibility, allowing you to pay for only the equipment you need for a limited period. This option often benefits smaller companies — especially subcontractors — that don’t have the resources to maintain a fleet of equipment. Of course, that doesn’t mean renting can’t benefit larger construction businesses under the right circumstances.
Choosing to rent a piece of equipment means no big down payment, as with a purchase, and less money spent on the overall arrangement than with a lease. Plus, many consider rental payments as a tax-deductible operating expense, which simplifies accounting.
Renting also frees you from responsibility for maintenance and repairs. And because most rental companies regularly update their inventories, you’ll generally have access to new (or newer) assets.
Naturally, there are downsides. You’ll be at the mercy of rental inventories when looking to procure that “must-have” piece of equipment. And, in some cases, renting could increase your overall expenses (compared with leasing and owning), because rental companies often build higher costs into their payment terms.
Changes to lease accounting standards proposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board are expected to go into effect in the next several years. These changes will affect financial statements of companies following Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Currently, as long as an agreement doesn’t meet the criteria of a capital lease, equipment lease payments are considered operating expenses and don’t appear on balance sheets. The new standard would require businesses to list leased equipment as assets and lease payments as liabilities on their books. Including long-term lease commitments as liabilities can potentially reduce a company’s working capital and negatively affect its debt-to-equity ratio, thus potentially affecting its bonding capacity.
As mentioned, large construction companies may be able to own their own fleets. But, for small to midsize businesses, some combination of owned, leased and rented equipment will likely make the most sense. Your financial advisor can help you find the right mix for your situation.
Looking for help with deciding whether to buy, lease or rent your construction equipment? Simply looking for construction accounting and advisory services? Contact Sabre Linahan at 404-874-6244 or contact us online and we’ll be there to assist.
If you have any questions and would like to connect with a team member please call 404-874-6244 or contact an advisor below.CONTACT AN ADVISOR
Subscribe to our newsletters to get inside access to timely news, trends and insights from Smith + Howard.